logical problem of the "protection of intellectual property."
Dano:
There is a site A (belonging to the subject A), which posted a big noise-file called white_noise_sample2378.bin. Analysis of the file shows that it actually is the result of a good random number generator. There are no laws in the file is not.
There is a site B (owned by subject B), which posted a big noise-file called white_noise_sample8665.bin. Analysis of the file indicates that the file is also a result of a good generator random numbers. There are no laws in the file also is not.
has a site at which the subject leaves the T record (forum, blog, guest book, otherwise) that the result of some function F (for simplicity we take the commutative feature bitwise XOR) with the files and white_noise_sample2378.bin white_noise_sample8665.bin strange way an object is protected by law "intellectual property" (eg, the distribution of Windows or a brand new blockbuster).
Vopros1: On who try to sue "fighters with the pirates" unless a clear connection between A, B, C and D are not visible and the creation date of both files can not be installed. Not excluded that some of them completely irrelevant to what is happening, and indeed the noise, which hosted the second noise-generated file.
Vopros2: Which files will need to remove from the site and on what basis. After all, the scheme completely symmetric and any pair (A, B) with equal bases can wonder - why is his own very legitimate need to remove the file only from the fact that someone made him "the key to the network laid out in an illegal content "?
Vopros3: Are the answers to questions 1 and 2 to the case of sites and files, rather than two thousand, and different combinations of them (not necessarily in pairs - possibly from a larger number) result in a change various "illegal content"?
0 comments:
Post a Comment